Same same but different but still same
, just on the other side
My guess is 80 and you can vote there to guess…
I’ll go with it being 75-90gp, just a guess.
Should we tell him?
For all those who are excited about ZRH, here’s a link to the live cameras.
https://www.flughafen-zuerich.ch/en/passengers/experience/experiences/webcams
cool, thx
![]()
Well i hope so cause a346F would probably be my most used cargo till some of the other cool cargos get added
On the live cams of Zurich the construction is going well, I don’t know if there’s any other parts of the construction that I’m missing at the moment. But this is what stood out for me.
I don’t like the fact that they will do a Dock A thing, it’s less realistic
If they did it as it is now, it would become unrealistic once it’s finished in real life
I think it’s much better to do it this way and have it ready, rather than the layout becoming “obsolete” in a few years time
Thats a valid point
I’m just hoping for more taxi out operations on remote stands instead of pushing back
that’s already the case in PRG, so I see no reason why it wouldn’t be implented in ZRH (or others) where possible
I think this feature needs more recognition In future plans of World of Airports. I like how there’s no wasting time with pushback tug and adds a unique dimension to the gameplay of these new airports like ZRH.
Has it been established if the 747 classic series is only event contracts? Or will there be map contracts as well
Nothing as of yet. Going off the 2010 limit, I presume the -300 will have a few regular contracts and perhaps the -200F’s. Devs may be kind and push back that 2010 limit though so we’ll have to see. Hoping for Ansett myself but still no images of the -300 livery’s ![]()
I’m really hoping the devs change that now, it feels like a perfect opportunity. If we eventually get aircraft like the TriStar, DC-8, B707 or DC-10, it would be a shame if most of the liveries ended up “locked” as events. Even if we had to pay extra SP.
Although I don’t know if there’s perhaps an objective technical reason not to do this, such as that the huge increase in number of available contracts would mean more server traffic and thus higher operating costs.
I know it’s featured at PRG but it’s one of the few airports (apart from BRI and SYD with only 2 stands, IRL has more) that has it. Even SXM should at C7-10 stand but the planes end up pushing back which is not necessary and I hope will be changed in the future.
So I’m just hoping that won’t be the case for ZRH
I completely agree!


