Oh you’re first post was slightly more complicatedly written but I understand and I agree with that.
On that note, would be nice to have an option to choose how a contract operates.
I.E. how like your own plane starts off at your base, have contracted planes also able to be scheduled to start of from the base like Qantas planes starting off at SYD while Air New Zealand flights come in from AKL.
I mention this because in real life, SYD operates with both runways for arrivals. For example, in the case of LHR, how many times have they proposed arriving via both runways? And the response has always been that in real life, they don’t operate that way.
So, they should apply the same criteria to SYD with arrivals via both runways.
This is what bugs me buying flight numbers with SP; it’s only correct half the time (in- or outbound).
Hello devs, will the rest of the remote stands at syd get activated please. And allow for muliple pushbacks where the hanger area stands are all along for more frequent movement? And allow for dual landings please its a very wanted feature.
I notice that 3 Airbus liveries (A306, A35K [not Thousand] & A388 [not Love at First Flight]) and 2 Boeing liveries (B748 [not Red] & B764) have been removed from WoApedia. Is this a bug or the intended outcome from the update quoted?
I would also like to add to this that some of the pushbacks are so unrealistic still, why are the planes getting pushed just to do a 180 from some stands not evem at syd?
Can y’all please stop suggesting in the release notes thread? Thanks
Not suggestions its what should o pf been added tbh
Sir, that is the exact definition of a suggestion. This is not a request thread, the devs will not see your plea. If you want something, there is a way to Feature Request in a new thread.
Already have and have got no response its a syd upgrade but half of the festures that were requested for syd were not added and people still want them so the best way to do that is by putting it under release notes and stating the problems
Sorry, where did the devs say “everything you ever wanted from SYD in 3.2.0?”
What you are asking for is possible. In a separate thread. Called a feature request. Doing it here is akin to a dog barking up the wrong tree. You will not get what you want.
Woof woof
Whatever makes u happy🙄
Unfortunately there are these types of users who are not satisfied with anything, leave the developers alone, they are doing a great job, I am satisfied with what they have released because it is the huge effort is made for each update, don’t forget that it’s a game and yes I know the developers said they wanted to get closer to reality but they are doing it step by step, I am satisfied with what they are doing and as I said unfortunately there are users who are not satisfied with anything and should just say thank you for this enormous effort instead of just demanding, thank you Be thankful that it’s a free game, they could easily abandon the game and nothing would happen, however, they are always releasing new and better things for the game, I say thank you. from the heart because thanks to this game I am happy.
If each taxi path must be manually created, then enabling both runways for landing increases complexity dramatically. You go from 1,080 paths to 2,160 just for landings, and 4,320 total if departure paths are mirrored.
This is why airports with dual-runway ops are a huge development effort — not because of the runway itself, but because of the exponential increase in taxi path logic.
We will get there, step by step, we try to keep the updates controllable, if do such change it will probably be in single update and nothing else as this could in case of a error mess up the whole airport.
One million percent agree. Devs are doing an amazing job. If people complain so much they should just make their own!
How to take action without permission,This game is not only the efforts of the engineers, but also the collective efforts of all players to move the game towards a better direction.
Thank you for your response Charlie, and clearing up this feature. Others on this thread where complaining that i was trying to get a point across with this feature as its been highly requested. Thank you again for clearing this up😁