Nah but that’s not a defense.
wasnt supposed to be, im getting off anyway so dw about me
I agree with the E-size aircraft aspect, that should be in the airport. But aside from that this is just what they said they were going to do and I’m happy about it. I completely understand everyone’s grievances but I like this and I want the devs to see that there are players happy with what they’ve done.
If I do an example regarding myself, I’d love to see Manchester in-game and that airport is quite popular. I’d also like to see Liverpool and I’ve suggested it on the forum here. Now if Manchester was added generic I’d be disappointed, but I’d also be happy I have an airport in the North of England, near me that I could use and operate all the LCC’s and mainline airlines out of, as well as make it a cheeky BA base, that’s how I like to play the game. Liverpool I’d love to see as a generic airport, it’s not popular enough to ever be its own thing but I’d still use it as it’s an east west runway, with a terminal and some parking. If they add a second taxiway or a cargo area, I won’t mind, but if they modelled it like Heathrow, I would as Liverpool isn’t like that. If people really want a realistic CNN in the future, I’m 100% certain that the dev lads at WOA HQ qould be on it.
3 Likes
all im saying is for generic airport at least the runways, taxilayout should be the same. And for CNN that isnt even the case. so you cant call it CNN imo
4 Likes
Honestly I think we should ALL stop arguing. And I get all of your points and I in fact agree with you. Even when it was announced I said
However I was just bringing all that up because it’s pointless to argue about something the devs have already decided on and basically finished the first one. So this is clearly something they are planning to do for the future. While I dont support the idea of generic airports, I will support all of the devs decisions. And I encourage us all to do the same, instead of ranting about it before it has even come out.
Lets just enjoy this update and see what the future bring for this game 
5 Likes
i hope the devs see how we feel about this and change the way of generic airports. Thats what i want. I mean eventually devs want the players to be happy right, and I dont think that is the case rn, But as you said, end of argument now.
3 Likes
Going to stop the arguement now, never planned on it 
. But I am happy, they could change it in the future to make it look a little more like it but as you say, they want the players to be happy and I am and it appears Pizza is too. Now yes that’s only 2 vs the 6ish on this post who aren’t but that still means they’ve done well. Hopefully in future, they do a little more with the layout for the next one but I’m happy as is
2 Likes
Players werent happy when the UI got changed. Then players werent happy when the UI got changed AGAIN. Yet look where we are now. When the devs make game-changing decisions like this, its for what they predict will benefit the game in the long term. And they havent missed on these predictions once.
5 Likes
no i wont, i will never agree with labeling an airport that is not even remotely close to that airport IRL. Dont think you know me, because you dont. Dont think you know what i will think eventually later on, because you dont.
3 Likes
Ok look, my bottom line is that this is they’re decision and they’re not going to change it because a couple of people on the forum are unhappy about it. There isnt much you can do except adjust or not play it…
I think they will, if they see a big group doesnt agree with this, in the future generic airports might be done differently and better.
1 Like
5 Likes
Well said!!! I love this game and im happy with all the devs giving to us. I think i will never play a generic airport cause i see the game as a rl simulation, but a lot of players play it completly different and thats ok… + if the generics help to develop things for “real” airports its a win win 
Again, thx to the devs for everything!!!
2 Likes
because your not in the dc prob
1 Like
Your right lol. I have no clue of all the chaos that goes on over there!
hahaha
Personally, I believe this is the optimal solution for balancing quality and quantity.
Of course, since it’s still a work in progress, it’s far from perfect. However, I don’t think this model could represent airports like SIN, IST, or JNB.
I think it’s a positive development that airports which previously weren’t even mentioned are now getting a chance.
1 Like
I went in once. Never again .
1 Like
They never do AMS generic, a Dutch airport that be in generic category be Rotterdam RTM not AMS.
1 Like
That’s why I didn’t agree with generic airports because I knew this was going to happen, many people were going to complain, but everyone called me stupid. There are a lot of very ungrateful players here, with the effort that a game development team makes they do the best they can and at least they are trying to make sure that we are all happy.happy But there are not always people who are not happy with anything, if only the developers would stop updating the game so that we all learn to value the effort of people who make A game for the love of aviation so that we can learn, leave the complaints and enjoy the game for free. At some point they will get tired of all the complaining they do.
2 Likes