How would everyone feel about wanting schipol/and if we think about it 6 runways 1 big terminal plenty of stands and a cargo terminal it would be a great airport to play as there are many great airlines
Yes, AMS would be wonderful. It is one of the most desired airports in WOA.
BUT, first of all airports have to be integrated worldwide,
I think the aim is to have as many different (size) airports (as possible) available worldwide. But this also means that airports close to each other are almost impossible. This means that AMS will not come (in my opinion), firstly because there are already plenty of airports available in Europe and secondly because AMS is too close to others. Especially as a mega-airport too close to mega-airport LHR. Thatâs why DXB wonât happen (because itâs too close to MCT).
Or JFK/EWR because of IAD
If we are lucky, there will be another airport in Europe in the next 10 years. But perhaps smaller and perhaps further away from others (if possible), such as southern France, Spain, Portugal, Scandinavia or even south-east Europe.
But overall, Europe will be the last continent to be thought of for the time being.
Even if, as a German, I would like it to be different.
CTA LICC
LOCATION:
ITALY, EUROPE
I live in Catania and i like to play my favorite Airport in the game
Main runway:
08-26 (2500M)
Catania Fontanarossa boasts a whopping 1.5 million monthly passengers in the May period and nearly 2 million from the July and August period, MONTHLY of course.
I do not understand why BARI was introduced rather than Catania, which is supposed to be the HUB of the Mediterranean.
In any case, UP.
Because they needed an airport that was bigger than INN, but not too big. Also welcome to the forum!
Catania isnât bigger than Bari, theyâre similar (and I Rhino Bari Is bigger than Catania)
Catania is much larger than Bari.
Bari averages 600 flights per week, compared to Cataniaâs 980.
Letâs talk at the passenger level.
In addition, Catania has 31 stalls for aircraft.
Sorry i havenât too mucho knowledge Iâm Just 12 years old
- Stockholm Arlanda International Airport
- Stockholm, Sweden
- ARN (ICAO: ESSA)
- 01L, 10,830 ft. (For takeoffs)
01R, 8,202 ft. (For landings)
19R, 10,830 ft. (For landings)
19L, 8,202 ft. (For takeoffs)
08, 8,202ft. (Infrequently used)
26, 8,202ft. (Infrequently used)
4a. Both pax and cargo
5a. SAS, Norwegian, Ryanair.
6. Oslo, Helsinki, Frankfurt, Bergen, Tromsø, Visby, Gothenburg, Kiruna, Istanbul, London, Paris, Bari, Athens, Madrid, Copenhagen, Beijing, New York, Doha, Dubai, Berlin.
7. The most likely new airports in Europe are probably going to be in the edges of the continent, as to not overcrowd the core even more. Leaving Finnoscania with three main airports to be the perfect place for a new European airport. Stockholm is in the center, and has opportunity for lots of interesting destinations. It would also open up the world of Nordic airlines to be more integrated into the game, with carriers like SAS and Norwegian, and BRA getting upgraded route networks, and planes. And even new airlines to be added like Widerøe.
Ok I just want to say. As much as Iâd love Manchester and Gatwick and Dublin. It wonât happen. We wonât get any other airport in the British isles for the foreseeable future. We already have LHR and for small countries like that we wonât get more than one airport.
Youâre probably right, at least for the foreseeable future. Never say never though as we donât know what the developers will plan once the goal to have an airport from each continent is achieved. For example LHR to MAN is a similar distance (if not near enough the same) as PRG to LEJ.
ARN is a very good idea, because Scandinavia is clearly under-represented in game. I was actually going to recommend TOS Tromsø because of how far north it is. Weâll see when their new terminal is completed.
If you did something for Widerøe, Bodo BOO would probably be better as itâs their hub.
True, but the existing BOO wonât last long. An entirely new airport will be built within the next 6-8 years and the old airport will be redeveloped. Adding BOO would be a very long term project.
I didnât know that, in that case you would probably be right with Tromsø being better.
- Edinburgh Airport
- Edinburgh, Scotland
- EDI
- 06/24 2,556 Metres and 8,386 Ft
4.A passenger and cargo
5a. KLM, Loganair, British airways, westjet, united, qatar airways, hainan, airfrance, airbaltic, norwegian, iberojet, easyjet, ryanair, aer lingus, eurowings, jetblue, delta, brussels, SAS, Jet2, TUI
-
AMS, CDG, YYZ, DUB, CGN, ATL, YYZ, BRU, JFK, FRA, MAD, ARN, LHR, BCN, LGW, TFS, FAO, DOH, ACE, PMI
-
I think this would be a good small airport with a similar size to Bari, it has multiple large stands and would be a good airport to go along with the introduction of the B767 as many american airlines fly it to here
Got some numbers for EDI edinburgh airport
Cargo -
3 L/M/S standa
8 M/S stands
Passenger -
9 L/M/S (3 might also be X but i canât fact check)
22 M/S
3 S
Because of this i think it would be a similar size to Prague or San diego, some L stands are debatable because they can fit the L but possibly not with the other L in the stand next to it. Some L stands could also be swapped for 2 M/S stands like they do in real life but I think more L stands is better
edi sounds like a good place
Only one I can see us getting would be LCY.
Highly doubt LCY would even be considered, itâs literally the other side of the city to an Airport we currently have, realistically, Iâd imagine any UK airport coming in the future would be from either MAN, EDI or EMA.
My bets would be on MAN, as Taimodels have modelled it, but this wonât be for a very long time, assuming another British airport is added to start with.